Quantcast
Channel: Breslov Center
Viewing all 556 articles
Browse latest View live

Trip to Uman with Rabbi Erez Moshe Doron

$
0
0

בקרוב! נסיעה לאומן עם הרב ארז משה דורון
SOON: Trip to Uman 
Led by Rabbi Erez Moshe Doron
קצר וקולע - הכנה לפורים אצל רבינו הקדוש
Feb. 24-25th
24.2.16 - 25.2.16
מיועד לגברים ולנשים
פרטים נוספים בהמשך 

Contact: 
Or Pnimi Breslov 
אור פנימי ברסלב 08-6640064
9.00-13.00
(Israel time)

Tu B’Shvat and Shabbat Shira

$
0
0
From OU.org:
Rabbi Dr. Asher Meir
Rav Natan of Breslav writes: “Tu BiShvat is always adjacent to Shabbat Shira, and sometimes it falls on Shabbat Shira itself” – as it does this year (and 30% of all years). Rav Natan explains this proximity in an involved Chasidic digression (Likutei Halakhot Orla 3), based on a teaching of his Rebbe, Rav Nachman of Breslav (Likutei Moharan II 8). We will attempt to present the main elements of the explanation here, including many illustrations from revealed sources that are not mentioned by these awesome Chasidic masters.
Our prayers are almost always requests for mercy, as the gemara states (Berakhot 20b), that prayer is “mercy”. The natural world has its laws of nature, and the Torah has established laws of punishment “measure for measure”, but in our prayers we ask that these laws be circumvented: We ask HaShem to send rain even if the forecast wouldn’t predict it, or to be lenient with us even if we really did transgress.
Prayers for justice, on the other hand, are extremely rare. The gemara warns, “Anyone who asks the judgment of his fellow man, he is punished first!” (RH 15b.) Rav Nachman writes that such a prayer is usually “eaten up” by the side of evil. It generally does not stem from the uplifting, idealistic side of man that inspires our other prayers, but rather from the small-mindedness and vindictiveness that are the usual fare of the evil impulse. One who would pray for judgment needs extraordinary qualities. First of all, he must have unblemished righteousness; otherwise he will be punished first. Second of all, his request for judgment must itself stem from a recognition that ultimately such judgment is necessary in order for kindness to reign. We find for example, that the blessing asking for judgment on the “minim” could only be composed by Shmuel HaKatan who was known for his extreme self-effacement (see Sanhedrin 11a) and lack of vindictiveness (see Avot 4:19); furthermore, it was only introduced when it was clear that it was an absolute necessity to save the prayer service from malicious informers (Berakhot 28b). (Rav Nachman explains that such a necessity generally arises when mercy is distorted in order to protect and nurture wickedness and cruelty. Judaism reconciles itself to the need to be “cruel to be kind” only with difficulty, when the world considers it “kind to be cruel”.) Rav Nachman states that when such an extraordinary individual does arise and confronts such an extraordinary situa- tion, he has immense power to subdue evil and to awaken to repentance those who have been caught in its grip. In fact, it is this exact trait that gives a person the ability to reprove others in an inspirational way that affirms their basic goodness (as we explained last week). Rav Nachman calls this a “voice” or a “song” which awakens the dormant good in wrongdoers and gives them a beautiful fragrance that nullifies the stench of sin.
Rav Nachman refers here, as he often does, to a “single, double, triple and quadruple song”; he explains that these four levels refer to different levels of Divine providence. The lowest level is completely according to natural law, without any Divine guidance (though of course the laws themselves are of Divine origin!); the highest level is completely according to Divine intervention, as the world will be guided in the time of the complete redemption.
We can explain that someone who has the most profound understanding of HaShem’s ways is able to perceive that sin ultimately is also part of HaShem’s plan. What is considered against HaShem’s will at a lower level of providence is actually part of His greater blueprint at a higher level. A normal person is not capable of such a perspective; if you tell him that evil is part of G-d’s plan, then he will feel no distress in the face of wickedness, whether his own or of others. If he understands that evil is against G-d’s will, then he considers the sinner banished from G-d. Only a few, such as Moshe, are able to encompass all these songs; these individuals are able to fight evil with all their might, yet reprove wrongdoers with a perfect faith that they are still servants of G-d, involved in advancing His plan.
Rav Natan writes that one actual song that gives expression to this supernal song is the Song of the Sea. This song celebrates the judgment of Egypt. Normally this would be highly inappropriate; the Midrash states that the angels were forbidden to sing during the splitting of the sea (Yalkut Shimoni Beshalach). But Moshe, who led Israel in this song, had a perfect apprehension of how this judgment, with its awesome demonstration of HaShem’s sovereignty and His election of Israel, was necessary for the establishment of G-d’s kingdom among mankind. This song refers to natural phenomena; to G-d’s judgment and retribution; and ultimately to the final redemption: “HaShem will reign for ever and ever”. Thus it encompasses all of the four levels of song.
We explained above that prayers for judgment are generally acceptable only for truly extraordinary individuals in truly extraordinary circumstances. Yet there is an exception: Rosh HaShana, the Day of Judgment. On this day, all of us pray for a favorable judgment: while we make pleas for leniency, ultimately we ask judgment to be done. Rav Natan explains that this special quality extends to all the New Years mentioned in the mishna, including Tu BiShvat, the New Year for trees. It seems that on these days all Israel merit a bit of the spiritual might which makes such a prayer acceptable. And on Shabbat Shira, all of us participate in the public recitation of the Song of the Sea; evidently on this day all Israel merit a dim apprehension of the “four levels of song”. Since these two qualities are intimately connected, it is natural that Shabbat Shira and Tu BiShevat are always in close proximity.

Breslov Campus Winter 2016 Semester

$
0
0

From Breslov.org:
In honor of our exciting Winter 2016 semester, we are thrilled to introduce our brand-new Breslov Campus website!
We have listened to your feedback and are pleased to announce our new website’s great features and additions, including:
  • Daily inspirational videos
  • Easy access to our Breslov.org audio and video library
  • Registration and login no longer necessary to access live courses and archived material
  • Each course page has been simplified to include everything you need to know to access live classes or watch and listen to archived material
And MUCH more…
So click here now to take part in our exciting Winter Semester 2016 starting this Sunday, or to watch a short inspirational Breslov video.
Happy Learning!

The Tzaddikim Are One

$
0
0

By Dovid Sears

L’ilui nishmas Shulamis Na’ami bas Gedaliah Aryeh (Sochaczewsky), a”h

Most Breslover chassidim (and many “misnagdim”) are familiar with Rebbe Nachman’s hispa’arus—his seeming self-praise. One such remark recorded by Reb Noson is that Rebbe Nachman received his teachings from a “place” from which no other tzaddik had ever received (Chayei Moharan #353, hashmatah). Some take these statements to indicate disrespect for other tzaddikim, or to lead to the conclusion that the Rebbe’s leadership is of an exclusive nature. Both conclusions would be entirely erroneous. And such errors could be extremely damaging.

First of all, Rebbe Nachman did not see himself as the “tzaddik ha-dor” to the exclusion of others, but acknowledged and praised many of his contemporaries, as well as tzaddikim of the recent past.  

In Chayei Moharan #353, Reb Noson relates some of the praises of Rebbe Nachman for his holy great-grandfather, the Baal Shem Tov (whose spiritual rung he identifies with the sefirah of Binah that is above Chokhmah; see below); the Maggid of Mezeritch (whose spiritual rung he identifies with the sefirah of Chokhmah); and his uncle, Reb Borukh of Medzhibuzh (whose spiritual rung he identifies with the sefirah of Binah that is below Chokhmah). (It seems that “Binah above Chokhmah” is a way of describing the sefirah of Keser, since both are termed “makifin,” or “encompassing lights”—Binah in relation to the seven lower sefiros of ChaGaS-NHYM, and Keser to the entire array of sefiros from Chokhmah to Malkhus. Thus, the Rebbe’s remarks may be understood as saying that the wisdom of the Baal Shem Tov included everything that would subsequently be revealed or developed by the other Chassidic masters. And he implicitly designated the Maggid and Reb Borukh as outstanding figures in the dissemination of the Baal Shem Tov’s “encompassing light.”) 

The Rebbe was born and raised in the Baal Shem Tov’s house in Medzhibuzh, met many of the surviving disciples of both the Baal Shem Tov and the Maggid during his childhood, including the elderly Toldos Yaakov Yosef, and he used to pray at length beside his great-grandfather’s grave (Shivchey ha-RaN #19). (For a discussion of the ancient Jewish practice of praying beside the graves of the tzaddikim, see Rabbi Gedaliah Kenig, Chayei Nefesh, sec. 32-36, as found in Shaarey Tzaddik, Vol. III, which cites a number of primary sources.)

In Chayei Moharan #553 (in the editor’s note), Rebbe Nachman’s praises of other Chassidic masters are also enumerated, including a number of his living contemporaries. He described Reb Levi Yitzchok, the Berditchover Rov, as “unique in his generation” (also see Chayei Moharan #270, where he compared the Berditchover Rov to the Tefillin of the Jewish people); regarding the Maggid of Mezeritch, “one may believe anything [said about his spiritual attainments or alleged miracles]”; he extolled the Baal Shem Tov in the highest terms (also see Chayei Moharan #280 re. the uniqueness of the Baal Shem Tov); and he declared that Reb Pinchos of Koretz was at one time the greatest tzaddik on earth, adding, “Happy are the eyes that beheld Reb Pinchos!” As for Rabbi Yaakov Yosef of Polonoye (author of Toldos Yaakov Yosef and other early Chassidic classics), “All his works are holy and wondrous—but the tzaddik himself was much higher!” He had similar praises for the Rebbe Reb Elimelekh of Lizhensk (author of Noam Elimelekh), and the latter’s brother, Reb Zushe of Annipola.

Other Chassidic masters whom Rebbe lauded are mentioned in Chayei Moharan #553. They include Reb Michel of Zlotchov; Reb Avraham of Kalisk; Reb Menachem Mendel of Vitebsk; Reb Nochum of Chernobyl; the Rav of Neshchiz; the Rav of Alik; the Rav of Kozhnitz; the Rav of Lantz and Lublin; Reb Aharon of Titiev; and the Rebbe’s uncle, Reb Moshe Chaim Ephraim of Sudylkov.

In Chayei Moharan #410, the Rebbe contrasts philosophical writings with those of tzaddikim: first and foremost, Chazal; the kabbalists (Zohar, Arizal); and specifically, Likutey Amarim (Maggid of Mezeritch), Toldos Yaakov Yosef, and the teachings of the Baal Shem Tov (as found in various early Chassidic works).

In addition, there are well-known Breslov oral traditions about the Rebbe’s friendship with the Baal ha-Tanya and his praises of the older Chassidic leader. Rebbe Nachman and the Baal ha-Tanya each spent a Shabbos with the other, and according to Breslov tradition, the Rebbe took the Baal ha-Tanya to some of his wealthy supporters to solicit donations for Chassidic immigrants in the Holy Land, introducing him as “a true talmid chokhom” (probably in both senses of the term: a master Torah scholar and a “disciple of the wise,” meaning the Maggid of Mezeritch and Reb Mendel of Vitebsk, among others).

In Shivchey ha-RaN #20, it states that after his marriage, when the Rebbe moved away from Medzhibozh, he used to visit the grave of Reb Yeshaya of Yanov, a disciple of the Baal Shem Tov buried near his new home.

Much is made of the Rebbe’s remarks that his path went beyond that of his great-grandfather (e.g., Chayei Moharan ##381, 393). However, Breslover friends who were close to Reb Levi Yitzchok Bender, zal, have told me that Reb Levi Yitzchok often pointed out that of all Chassidic groups today, Breslov is closest to the “derekh ha-Baal Shem Tov,” and brought various proofs to support his claim. The Rebbe was very much a product of the Baal Shem Tov’s “cheder,” and his teachings were intimately connected to those of the Baal Shem Tov.

Reb Noson’s illustrious disciple, Reb Nachman Goldstein, the Rov of Tcherin, in addition to his commentaries on Likutey Moharan and other Breslov works, authored two popular anthologies of non-Breslov Chasidic teachings: Leshon Chassidim, which collects teachings of disciples of the Baal Shem Tov, and Derekh Chassidim, which collects teachings from disciples of the Maggid. These teachings are arranged alphabetically by topic and to those knowledgeable in Breslov Chassidus, implicitly show the many resonances between Breslov and the other early Chassidic writings.

When I lived in Borough Park in the 1980s, I once asked the prominent Breslover, Rabbi Shlomo Chaim Vitriol, why the Tcheriner Rov created these two works. Was it so that his fellow Breslovers would realize how connected we are to the other schools of Chassidus, or to show other Chassidim how the teachings of the Baal Shem Tov and the Maggid and his talmidim are kindred to those of Rebbe Nachman? Reb Shlomo Chaim immediately said, “Both are true!”

Beyond this, the Rebbe taught that we should love and revere all of the tzaddikim. He cautions, “Never say ‘this tzaddik is appealing (tzaddik na’eh), but that tzaddik isn’t appealing.’ ” This seems to reflect the concept he discusses in Likutey Moharan I, 64:4 (based on kabbalistic principles), that despite all appearances, the tzaddikim are one. Elsewhere, he states that the seeming strife between the tzaddikim is only due to our pgam (deficiency) (Likutey Moharan I, 5:4; also see Likutey Moharan I, 56:8, which discusses strife (machlokes) and the higher knowledge (da’as), as personified by Moshe, in which contradictory viewpoints coalesce.)

This isn’t merely theoretical. In Chayei Moharan #101 (BRI English translation, #227), Reb Noson preserves one of Rebbe Nachman’s dreams. The soul of a former disciple appears before the Rebbe, complaining that he has gone astray because he lost faith in the Rebbe. “Is there no one besides me to go to?” the Rebbe asks. “If you don’t believe in me, go to one of the other tzaddikim!”

Certainly, Breslover chassidim believe that Rebbe Nachman is the tzaddik emes, from whom all receive, whether they know it or not (Likutey Moharan I, 70). This tzaddikis compared to the yesod ha-pashut, theunitary “primal element” from which the four elements of earth, water, wind and fire derive(Likutey Moharan II, 66, 67). But when understood in the light of Rebbe Nachman’s broader teachings, this belief should unite us, not divide us. Kulam ahuvim, kulam kedoshim, all are beloved, all are holy. 

The Tzaddikim Are One: Part II

$
0
0
(Drawing by Hyman Bloom)
By Dovid Sears
L’ilui nishmas Shulamis Na’ami bas Gedaliah Aryeh (Sochaczewsky), a”h

After writing the first posting, I had a few more thoughts that I’d like to add here.

Rebbe Nachman said some extreme things about his own teachings, which he understood to be nothing less than heavenly revelations. For example, he deemed the publication of Likutey Moharan to be “the beginning of the Redemption” (Chayei Moharan #346). He urged everyone to buy the book and study it, “even if one had to sell the pillow under his head” to do so (Chayei Moharan #349).

On the other hand, the Rebbe encouraged his followers to study “works by the tzadddikim of recent times, who follow the path of the Baal Shem Tov,” specifically mentioning the Toldos Yaakov Yosef and Likutey Amarim of the Maggid (Chayei Moharan #410, as cited in Part I of this posting). I would assume that the countless Chassidic works published subsequently, down until the present day, would similarly merit his endorsement. He did not take the approach of some other Chassidic masters that their followers should avoid studying Chassidic works from other schools, this being comparable to grazing in “fremder felder (foreign fields).”

The above remarks in Chayei Moharan #410 are probably the reason behind the Tcheriner Rov’s authorship of Leshon Chassidim and Derekh Chassidim.

As for Chabad, when the Baal ha-Tanya (en route to his fateful meeting with Reb Boruch of Medzhibuzh) came to Rebbe Nachman to spend Shabbos with him in Breslov, the Rebbe greeted his honored guest with the term “Sar ha-Elef,” “lord of thousands.” According to Breslov oral tradition, this took place on Erev Shabbos parshas Yisro, when in the weekly Torah portion, Yisro advises Moshe Rabbeinu to appoint a hierarchy of judges, the highest category of which is the “sarei alafim,” “lords of thousands.  It is likely that the teaching Rebbe Nachman delivered in his honored guest’s presence that Shabbos day was published as Likutey Moharan II, 72. (In possible support of this oral tradition, this lesson uniquely invokes the term “bilti gvul,” a common usage of the Baal ha-Tanya, as well as the Zohar’s drush on “melekh assur barehatim,” which similarly appears in the first section of the Tanya.)

Although Chabad and Breslov both seem to make absolute claims, historically the two schools of Chassidus were never at loggerheads (as has been too common in Chassidic history between various groups). In fact, according to Rabbi Yaakov Meir Schechter as cited in “Shivcho shel Tzaddik,” upon seeing a volume of Likutey Halakhos, the Tzemach Tzedek once commented (citing the words of Joseph’s brothers in Genesis 41:11), “Kulanu bnei ish echad nachnu… We’re all sons of one man!”

As is known, Rebbe Nachman greatly praised the telling of stories of tzaddikim, and stated that this is what inspired him as a small boy to strive to become a tzaddik (Sichos ha-RaN #138). In Likutey Moharan I, 234, he expounds on the concept that telling (or hearing) the stories of the tzaddikim (“whatever happened to them”) has the spiritual effect of hamtakas ha-dinim (“sweetening heavenly judgments”), and also “purifying the mind” (see there, especially with the commentary of Rabbi Shmuel Moshe Kramer, recently published as Mayim Amukim, Vol. 1; also cf. Chayei Moharan #479).

And the Rebbe “practiced what he preached,” often telling stories of other tzaddikim to his followers. When Reb Noson first had a private audience with him, the Rebbe told him three stories, one about Rabbi Mordechai of Neshchiz, one about Rabbi  Shneur Zalman of Liadi, and one about Rabbi Michel of Zlotchov. (Kokhvey Ohr, 11, 12, as cited in “Until the Mashiach,” pp. 81-82) (Reb Michel was one of the youngest disciples of the Baal Shem Tov and later, a disciple of the Maggid of Mezeritch, until he became a Rebbe in his own right. Reb Michel’s nusach ha-tefillah is preserved in the Siddur Tefilah Yesharah, known as the “Berditchover Siddur,” which some Breslover chassidim use [including a tall, thin shaliach tzibbur at the Uman Ritz]. And Breslover chassidim still sing “Reb Michel Zlotchover’s Deveykus Niggun,” just as we sing niggunim attributed to the Baal Shem Tov and the Maggid.)

The Rebbe also loaned Reb Noson his copy of Shivchey ha-Arizal, a collection of wondrous stories about the Arizal and his leading disciple, Rav Chaim Vital. This was to serve as a model for their future relationship (Avaneha Barzel, as cited in “Until the Mashiach,” p. 90).

In addition, Reb Avraham b’Reb Nachman preserved a number of stories that the Rebbe told about the Maharsha (Kokhvey Ohr, “Ma’asiyos u-Meshalim mi-Rabbeinu zal,” pp. 30-33). Reb Noson also includes several stories that the Rebbe told about Reb Mendel of Vitebsk  (Chayei Moharan #227 [#101 in the English BRI edition]). No doubt, there were many other such instances that have not been preserved.

To return to the subject of the “tzaddik emes (true tzaddik)” and hiskashrus (binding oneself to the tzaddikim), the Rebbe told his followers that it is beneficial to declare before davenning: “I hereby bind myself to all the tzaddikim of the generation” (Likutey Moharan I, 2:6, 9:4; Sichos ha-Ran #296).[i]The Rebbe explained that this is because the tzaddikim elevate the prayers of the entire Jewish people, conveying each prayer to its proper heavenly gate (Likutey Moharan I, 9:3).

Therefore, it is customary for Breslover Chassidim to recite the following verbal formula before each prayer service, as well as before performing any mitzvah or religious practice (such as immersing in a mikveh, studying Torah, lighting the Chanukah Menorah, etc.):

Hareini mekasher atzmi le-khol ha-tzaddikim amitiyim she-be-doreinu, u-lekhol ha-tzaddikim amitiyim shochnei afar, kedoshim asher ba-aretz hemah, u-be-frat Rabbenu ha-Kadosh, ha-Nachal Novea Mekor Chokhmah, Rebbe Nachman ben Feige—zekhusam yagen aleinu ve-al kol Yisrael, amen.

English translation: “I hereby bind myself to all of the true tzaddikim of our generation, and to all true tzaddikim who rest in the dust, ‘holy ones who are interred in the earth’ (Psalms 16:3), and in particular our holy master, the “flowing brook, source of wisdom” (Proverbs 18:4), Rabbi Nachman ben Feige—may their merits shield us, amen.”

(This precise source of this nusach is unknown, at least to me, but it has been published in numerous Breslover texts over the years. The reference to those who “rest in the dust” is based on Likutey Moharan 65:5.)

Note that “Hareini mekasher” includes the phrase “khol ha-tzaddikim amitiyim she-be-doreinu, u-lekhol ha-tzaddikim amitiyim shochnei afar.” It is not exclusive to Rebbe Nachman, but includes all the tzaddikim, past and present—because, as we have said, the tzaddikim are one.

Indeed, I have been told that Reb Avraham Sternhartz (Kokhav Lev) used to recite a longer nusach that also included the five preeminent tzaddikim whom the Rebbe singled out (Chayei Moharan #279).

We also see that Reb Noson often speaks of “tzaddikim” in the plural in Likutey Halakhos and Likutey Tefillos, and occasionally calls other great figures “tzaddik emes” beside the above-mentioned five. (Offhand, I remember that he says this of Rabbi Yochanan ben Zakkai and Rabbi Akiva, although I don’t recall the exact sources in Likutey Halakhos.)

Beyond this, the Rebbe states in Sefer Alef-Beis (Sefer ha-Middos) that one should honor anyone to whom Hashem has granted eminence (Sefer Alef-Beis, “Hisnasus” A-44).

May we be mekushar to all of the tzaddikim amitiyyim, not cause them dishonor even unintentionally, and follow in their holy ways, ad biyas goel tzedek, amen.




[i]Although Breslov is best known for the hiskashrus declaration, such declarations (or kavannos / intentions) are not unheard of in other Chassidic circles. For example, see Rabbi Meshullam Feivish of Zabarazh, Yosher Divrei Emes II, 33; Rabbi Yechiel Michel of Zlotchov, Toras ha-Maggid mi-Zlotchov, Tefillah 3, p. 320; Rabbi Menachem Nochum of Chernobyl, Me’or Einayim, Beshalach [end], in the name of the Baal Shem Tov; ibid. Yismach Lev, Berakhos 2 [end]; Rabbi Pinchas of Koretz, Imrei Pinchas [Bnei Brak 2003], Sha’ar Parshiyos u-Moadim, Elul, 424; Rabbi Chaim of Chernowitz, Be’er Mayim Chaim, Vayetzei (s.v. vayachalom); Rabbi Chanokh Henikh of Alesk, Lev Same’ach, Hakdamas ha-Mechaber le-Derekh ha-Tefillah; Rabbi Aryeh Leib Tzintz, Kometz ha-Minchah, Vayikra; Rabbi Yerachmiel Yisrael Yitzchak of Alexander, Yismach Yisrael, Be-ha’alosekha; Rabbi Yaakov Yitzchak of Lendov, Emes le-Ya’akov, Bereishis; Rabbi Shaul Brakh of Kashau, Giv’as Shaul, Va-eschanan; Rabbi Eliezer Zusia Portugal of Skulen, Kedushas Eliezer, Tzava’ah 4, Minhagim Tovim; et al.

Thursday night and Shabbos Mishpatim in Borough Park

Shaar ha-Kollel: The Universal Gate

$
0
0
(Painting by Jim Dine)
By Dovid Sears
L’illui nishmos avi mori: Leib ben Yitzchak Yaakov (yahrtzeit 30 Shvat, R”CH Adar 1)
Imi morasi: Gittel bas Yitzchak (yahrtzeit 5 Adar)
Dodi: Dov Ber ben Yitzchak Yaakov (yahrtzeit 29 Shvat)

When my wife and I lived in Providence, RI, in the early 1980s, we used to have a Shabbos guest who was an elderly Polish-born Holocaust survivor, a wonderful woman who had lived through many trials and troubles, named Chana Berman, a”h. I remember how frustrated she was by the diversity of nusachos (versions of the Siddur) she encountered: Nusach Ashkenaz, Nusach Sfard, “Nusach Ari” (i.e., Chabad), and others. “Why can’t we all daven the same thing?” she asked. “How did this happen?”


I explained that in general, these variations developed because of the galus (exile) of our people to different faraway lands, and the inevitable development of different customs over the generations. But the core elements of the prayers and the basic structure of the prayer services remain the same.


“But why do the Chassidim daven differently?” she persisted. “We’re all Ashkenazim…” That was a harder question to answer. And it is a question that many people still ask, even today.


The answer is not that this was an “ID Card” for an anti-establishment movement, as some contend (although it might have also served that purpose for those who wanted to identify with a special sect). The underlying issue is the quest for a Nusach Ari for Ashkenazim—a “kabbalistically correct” prayer text based on the views of the great Sefardic mystics, in particular Rabbi Yitzchak Luria (known as the holy Ari), but adapted to the Ashkenazic Siddur. What drove this effort was the primacy of the kabbalistic teachings that lay at the core of the Chassidic movement, which sought to bring its own type of mysticism to the masses of Eastern Europe, and ultimately far beyond.


Nusach Ari
Rav Chaim Vital states that each of the Twelve Tribes of Israel had its own nusach ha-tefillah and its own heavenly gate through which its prayers would ascend. These correspond to the Twelve Gates mentioned at the end of the Book of Ezekiel. (see Pri Eitz Chaim, Shaar ha-Tefillah, beginning; the main section about this was translated by Rabbi Aryeh Kaplan for his anthology on prayer, A Call to the Infinite, p. 85-87).


Nearly two centuries later, the Maggid of Mezeritch added that if someone didn’t know his tribe, there was a thirteenth gate. In terms of the prayer service, this corresponds to the nusach of the holy Ari, which the Maggid called the “Shaar ha-Kollel (Universal Gate).” And since we no longer know our tribe of origin, it is best to pray according to the nusach of the Ari (Maggid Devarav le-Yaakov 141). The Maggid’s teaching is probably what motivated the Baal ha-Tanya to devote himself to creating a nusach that would reflect that of the Arizal, but as tempered by other considerations, halakhic and kabbalistic.


The Baal ha-Tanya didn't create his siddur in a vacuum. Other Chassidic leaders attempted to do the same, including the Baal Shem Tov (and before him, other Ashkenazic kabbalists such as Rav Noson Adler, Rav Yaakov Koppel, etc.). Thus, most groups have their own variation of Nusach Sefard, which is really their own take on Nusach Ari. 


I suspect that the reason why no Chassidic leader seems to have accepted the nusach of the Arizal "lock, stock and barrel" is partlydue to confusions created by the conflicting texts available to them. (In recent years, a ground-breaking study and clarification of Nusach Ari was authored by Rabbi Daniel Rimmer, entitled Tefilas Chaim. So now we know what the Arizal actually davenned.) But in addition, the early Rebbes may have wished to include the nusach of Rav Moshe Cordovero (RaMaK) in the mix. I believe the RaMaK’s Siddur Tefillas Moshe was available in Europe (although that should be ascertained). And as modern scholars have shown, the RaMaK was also a major influence on the Chassidic movement.


The Rebbe stated that there is a complete unity between the kabbalah of the RaMaK and that of the Arizal (Chayei Moharan 364). It seems that this is how all the early Chassidic Rebbes felt, and not only about the RaMaK and the Arizal, but very likely about the many different voices in the Kabbalah. They accepted them all. Pnimiyus ha-Torah, the “inner dimension” of Torah, is by definition the realm of unity; so there was a widespread feeling that any disagreements must be minor. Therefore, different Rebbes made different personal choices when trying to decide which nusach to daven, and as in all tribes, the “Indians” simply followed their “chiefs.” 


Enter Breslov
There is an oral tradition (now printed in Siach Sarfey Kodesh, Vol. I, sec. 119) that Rebbe said that he didn't want to "misch" ("mix," but he means "butt into") the matter of nuschos. According to one version I have heard, he added "If I was born into a family that davenned according to Nusach Ashkenaz, I'd daven Nusach Ashkenaz." (in a similar vein, see Siach Sarfey Kodesh, Vol. II, sec. 90; cf. Rabbi Moshe Sofer’s defense of Nusach Ashkenaz in Teshuvos Chasam Sofer, Orach Chaim no. 16, also translated by Rabbi Aryeh Kaplan, loc. cit.).


As an aside, in Chayei Moharan 366, Reb Noson cites a mysterious remark the Rebbe once made about "the stage where we're we're holding in the prayers." Later the Rebbe explained that his teachings follow the order of the prayer service. “So far, we are before Baruch she-Amar, but after Hodu…" This is not the main point, of course, but his comment reflects Nusach Sefard (i.e., Nusach Ari)! 


We don’t have any directives in Breslov about davening according to a specific nusach, (other than what we have heard from Breslov elders about was was customary in the past). The only instruction the Rebbe gave us was that the conclusion of “Yishtabach” should be “Melekh Yachid Chay ha-olamim” (Siach Sarfey Kodesh, Vol. I, sec. 119). (Interestingly, this is the same as the nusach of the conclusion of “Yishtabach” in the Baal ha-Tanya’s Siddur, but it differs from Nusach Ari. I have yet to find an earlier source for this variation. These four words reflect the phraseology of Baruch She-amar, with which the Pesukey de-Zimra begins; also see Rav Avraham Dovid Lavut, Shaar ha-Kollel [Chabad], ad loc.) The Rebbe used the Siddur ha-Ari personally, as did several of his followers, but apparently the nusach found there did not receive any special emphasis.


Yet the term "Shaar ha-Kollel (Universal Gate)" does appear in Breslov teachings. In Likutey Moharan I, Torah 9, the Rebbe also discusses this subject. But there, he relates it to davening with hiskashrus (spiritual attachment) to the tzaddik emes, and not to a specific text at all.


Being the “point of truth among the tzaddikim,” the tzaddik emes personifies the unity of all Jewish souls and indeed, all of creation. The soul of the tzaddik emes is variously described as the neshamah haklalis (universal soul), sekhel hakollel (universal intellect), and mo’ach hakollel (universal mind) (see Likutey Moharan I, 61, II, 72, et al.). Therefore, the tzaddik emes is the Shaar ha-Kollel, whichever Siddur one prefers.

Rabbi Ozer Bergman - February 29

$
0
0

Exciting Judaism welcomes Rabbi Ozer Bergman from Jerusalem on Monday, February 29 at 7:30-9:15:

Topic: Hashem's Hidden Presence During Chaotic and Tumultuous Times --The Times of Esther and Forever After

Suggested Donation $10

At the Townhouse of David & Dina Reis
322 West 75 St, Corner Riverside Drive
New York, NY

Online Workshop For Women

$
0
0


Wednesday, March 2 at 9:00 pm (EST)–Workshop Two: You Can Heal Your Intimate Life-The Soul Connection

Presented by the Jewish Women’s Healing Program and BreslovWoman.org, Hosted by BreslovCampus.org

Workshop facilitated by Mrs. Chaya Rivka Zwolinski

Find out more information at BreslovWoman.org
Discounts/scholarships available.

The Wondrous Artistry of Bezalel

$
0
0
Painting by Kikuo Saito


Likutey Halakhos, Hil. Kiley Beheimah 3:1
Translated by Dovid Sears (unedited)
In Memory of Harry and Selma Swatsburg

This teaching from Reb Noson (of which we have translated and slightly abridged only the first of eight sections) is based on Likutey MoharanI, 61.

A few mystical concepts central to this lesson and Reb Noson’s related chiddushim(original ideas) are: the constriction of the Infinite Divine Light in the creation of the universe, known as tzimtzum—which is not only one primary event, but is ongoing throughout creation continually; another is din (or the plural, dinim), which can mean both judgement (whether heavenly or earthly) and the metaphysical forces that delimit, determine and give form to the various elements of the spiritual and physical realms; a third is sekhel, which can mean the human mind, but also the “Divine Mind” which conceives creation in all its diversity and animates everything, as in the verse, “How great are Your works, O God! Kulam bi-chokhmah asisahYou have made them all with wisdom” (Psalms 104:24). In kabbalistic contexts, sekhel” usually alludes to the sefiros of chokhmah, binah vi-daas, Wisdom, Understanding and Knowledge. The term also alludes to the Divine Reality hidden within every speck of existence. Reb Noson discusses both meanings.

Reb Noson begins by “setting the stage” with these concepts in his preface, and then goes on to discuss Bezalel, the construction of the Mishkan and its vessels, and by implication, human creative activity. Reb Noson’s words are in bold, while I have added a few brief explanatory remarks in standard typeface.

Preface:
All creative acts (melakhos) in the world are constrictions (tzimtzumim)—and all determining forces (dinim) are related to the intellect (sekhel) that corresponds to each constriction.  For every tzimtzum and din is derived from a particular sekhel, since [according to a fundamental Kabbalistic principal] “everything is clarified in thought” (Zohar II, 254b).

Here sekhel seems to have a double-meaning: the primary meaning is the metaphysical concept of the “Divine thought” that determines each constriction and din, thus to produce a certain manifest reality—in this case a melakhah, or creative act—while the secondary meaning would be the state of mind of the person performing that act. “Everything is clarified in thought” alludes to the Zohar’s metaphysics, which describe the World of Thought, World of Speech and World of Action as being part of a continuum from above to below. The rectification of a fault or disharmony on the lower levels must be completed on the highest level of the World of Thought, for this is its “root.”

All of these “intellects have no power to mitigate (literally, “sweeten) except by receiving from the Sekhel ha-Kollel (“Collective Intellect” or “Universal Mind”).

That is, all manifestations of the Divine plan and purpose within the multiplicity of creation, which are called “intellects,” have no power to temper the dinim, which are the forces that produce separateness and division, except by receiving Divine illumination from the Sekhel ha-Kollel, which is the“Collective Intellect” or “Universal Mind.” In Likutey Moharan I, 61, the lesson on which this teaching from Reb Noson is based, the Sekhel ha-Kollel is identified with Chokhmah Ila’ah, the “Supernal Wisdom” or “Highest Wisdom,” which is the all-encompassing Divine plan and purpose in creationas a whole. All “lower” or more specific wisdoms, related to the countless diverse forces and elements of creation, are offshoots or tributaries of Chokhmah Ila’ah.

The Sekhel ha-Kollel includes all intellects and all constrictions in the universe.  This is the paradigm of the Foundation Stone, the Holy of Holies, which “sweetens” all constrictions and all forces of division and harsh judgments.

Again in Likutey Moharan I, 61, the Rebbe alludes to the principle that the earthly realm corresponds to the heavenly realm. Accordingly, the highest degree of holiness in this world—and the channel for all Divine hashpa’os, or influences—is the Foundation Stone (Even Shesiya) and the Holy of Holies (Kodesh ha-Kadashim) in the Holy Temple in Jerusalem. This is where the Kohen Gadol (High Priest) enters on Yom Kippur to beseech G-d’s forgiveness for the entire Jewish People. Chazal also describe the Foundation Stone as the source of all blessings, which flow through “underground channels” to “water” the rest of the earth. This is analagous to Chokhmah Ila’ah, which animates and empowers all other wisdoms and “intellects” in the hierarchy of creation.

Section 1:
All labors and creative acts in the world are aspects of the constriction of the Divine Light.

Reb Noson alludes to the concept of the tzimtzum of the Infinite Divine Light (“Ohr ha-Ein Sof”) described by the Arizal in the beginning of the Sefer Eitz Chayyim.  Rebbe Nachman refers to this description in Lesson 61, Lesson 49, and elsewhere in Likutey Moharan.

For this is the essential craft or skill inherent in any given labor: to bring about the specific constriction that will produce the means to accomplish a particular activity. And all constrictions related to the Thirty-Nine Labors require perfection (tikkun) and “sweetening,” thus to spiritually refine them from the “impurity of the Serpent” associated with the sin of Adam and Eve, due to which humanity was afflicted with the Thirty-Nine Curses.

Chazal take the Thirty-Nine Labors entailed by the construction of the Mishkan to represent the paradigm of all creative labor. These are the primary categories of the labors or creative acts scripturally forbidden on Shabbos. The Thirty-Nine Curses (re. this term, see Zohar Chadash, Tikkunim, Vol. II, 91a) were the consequence of Adam and Eve eating the fruit of the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil.

These curses account for the strenuous efforts entailed by all Thirty-Nine Labors, as the verse states, “By the sweat of your brow you shall eat bread” (Genesis 3:19). Therefore, each person should sanctify himself and conduct his business or other occupation or labor with the greatest holiness, for the sake of G-d, thus to spiritually refine all endeavors and creative activities, which are part of the Thirty-Nine Labors, to refine them from the “impurity of the Serpent.” And the primary “sweetening” and refinement of the Thirty-Nine Labors, which are the paradigm of the tzimtzumim, is accomplished through the specific intellect that corresponds to each creative act and tzimtzum.

For each specific creative act contains a certain sekhel. There is no craft or labor that doesn’t entail some form of intellect and wisdom, and this sekhelhas its source Above in the holy Divine Intellect.

That is, every craft or labor has its ultimate source in the Divine will and wisdom, which imbue it with existence.

Therefore, it is necessary to perform that creative work or business transaction with great holiness, thus to bind the intellect inherent in the act with its source, namely, the corresponding specific intellect Above. By doing so, one mitigates the tzimtzum, since “no din is sweetened except in its source” (see Rabbi Chaim Vital, Eitz Chaim, Heikhal ha-Ketarim 13:11)—that is, through the related specific intellect that is its supernal source.

This is the paradigm of what the Torah states about Bezalel, who was the head of all artisans engaged in the holy work of the construction of the Mishkan: “And I shall fill him with the Divine spirit, with wisdom (chokhmah), with understanding (binah), and with knowledge (da’as) and all skilled work…” (Exodus 31:3). For Bezalel knew the wisdom, understand and knowledge related to each and every creative labor, as suggested by the Torah’s phrase, “to conceive designs [or ‘thoughts,’ a double-meaning], to work with gold, with silver, and with copper…” (ibid. 31:4). That is, he knew the Divine wisdom and sekhel related to each task. With this, he was able to mitigate the tzimtzum of that labor. For Bezalel knew how to combine the letters through which heaven and earth were created (see Zohar II, 152a); from these letters all things are created, in turn.

From the Ten Divine Utterances by which the universe was created the kabbalists understand that the “letters” of the creative Divine Speech are what animate and delimit all elements of creation—in the spiritual “worlds” (Atzilus / Emanation, Briah/ Creation, Yetzirah / Formation) and in this lowest physical world, which is part of the World of Asiyah (“Action”). Bezalel was granted the knowledge of these sublime mysteries, which enabled him to fashion the vessels of the Mishkan.

They comprise the sekhel related to each and every created thing, as the verse attests, “By the word of G-d the heavens were made, and by the breath of His mouth, all of their hosts” (Psalms 33:6). Each verbal utterance contains wisdom and intellect, for speech reveals knowledge (da’as); as it is written, “From His mouth [come] knowledge and understanding” (Proverbs 2:6)—that is, the wisdom and intellect through which a given thing comes into being. As the verse states, “You have made them all with wisdom” (Psalms 104:24).

Bezalel knew the letters through which heaven and earth were created—meaning the letters and intellect related to every constituent thing in the creation of heaven and earth.  All of them are in the category of tzimtzumim, in that G-d constricted each and every element that came into existence with its specific form and appearance. Thus, [Bezalel] engaged in the construction of the Mishkan, because from it is from the Mishkan that the Thirty-Nine Labors [forbidden on Shabbos] are derived (Shabbos 49b). And the Mishkan and the Holy Temple are the aspect of Da’as (Knowledge), which is the aspect of the holy—for the [essence of the] mind (sekhel) is called “holy.”

In a related vein, see Tanya, Chapter 53, citing Zohar II, 83a, that “the Torah comes from Chokhmah Ila’ah.” Since the Ark and Tablets (luchos) were present in the Holy of Holies of the First Temple, the Shekhinah(Divine Presence) was manifest there. However, this was not the case with the Second Temple, which did not contain the Ark and Tablets (luchos), concerning which Chazal state that the Shekhinah was not manifest there (Yoma 9b).

Therein are incorporated all wisdoms and all “intellects,” for they all receive from the Sekhel ha-Kollel, which corresponds to the Holy of Holies and the Foundation Stone (Even Shesiyah). For all constrictions and all creative labors are elicited from the Even Shesiya, which “waters” [“hoshetes,” a homiletical word-play] the world, and from it are elicited all the tzimtzumimrelated to all creatures and all creative acts in the world.  

Based on Reb Noson’s teaching and the various sources upon which his ideas are based, we see that the essence of all human creativity—In its primary context, which is the holy—is a “spin off” of Divine creativity, namely the “letters of the creation of heaven and earth.” By contemplating these theurgic mysteries, Bezalel, the “head of all artisans,” was able to create the vessels of the Mishkan. Through the sacrifices and various rites of the Mishkan and Holy Temple, these wondrous vessels brought about the spiritual elevation of all levels of creation: domem (the “silent”), tzomeach (the vegetative), chai (animals) and medaber (the “speaker,” i.e., the human) (see Rabbi Chaim Vital, Ta’amei HaMitzvos, Mitzvas Korbanos).

In some small way, we too participate in these tikkunim through our worldly activities, when we perform them according to the Torah and with the requisite kavanah(holy intention). And this principle must extend to the various forms of artistic creativity, if the artist is privileged to find the hidden spiritual core in the midst of the creative enterprise. Then the artist too may participate in the secret of “Bezalel”—“bi-tzelE-l,” which means “in the shadow of the Divine.”

Eizer L'Shabbos - Purim

Reciting the “Kedushah”

$
0
0

Thoughts on the Heart of the Prayer Service
By Dovid Sears
L’ilui nishmas imi morasi Gittel bas Yitzchak, a”h.
Yahrtzeit: 5 Adar II

Every Shacharis and Minchah where a minyan is present (as well as in the repetition of the Musaf service on Shabbos and Yom Tov), we recite in unison the “Kedushah.” This is the heart of the communal prayer service. Yet I suspect that many of us recite these words with only the most basic intention or understanding of the text. What is the meaning of the Kedushah? Why are these particular verses of such central importance?

Like virtually all facets of Judaism, there are many ways to approach this subject and many divergent meanings that the words imply, as discussed by the various commentators. There is no “one true way” when it comes to such matters; rather each sage presents his truth in his own terms. I would like to explore just a few commentaries here, and especially one that is based on a Breslov teaching. They can all work as kavanos, conceptual frameworks, when we recite the Kedushah in shul, which will make this part of the service all the more meaningful.

First let’s take a look at the text:

We will hallow and adore You—like the sweet words of the assembly of the holy Seraphim, who thrice repeat “holy” unto You, as it is written by Your Prophet:
“And they call to one another and say:
קָדוֹשׁ קָדוֹשׁ קָדוֹשׁ ה'צְבָאוֹת מְלֹא כָל הָאָרֶץ כְּבוֹדוֹ
Kadosh Kadosh Kadosh Hashem Tzivaos milo khol ha'aretz kevodo
"Holy, Holy, Holy, the Lord of Hosts, the entire world is filled with His Glory"(Isaiah 6:3).[i]
Those facing them offer praise and declare:
בָּרוּךְ כְּבוֹד ה'מִמְּקוֹמוֹ
Baruch kevod Hashem mim'komo
"Blessed be the glory of G-d from its Place"(Ezekiel 3:12).
And in Your holy scriptures it is written thus:          
יִמְלֹךְ ה'לְעוֹלָם אֱלֹהַיִךְ צִיּוֹן לְדֹר וָדֹר הַלְלוּיָהּ
Yimlokh Hashem li-olam Elohayikh Tziyon li-dor va-dor halleluyah.
"The L-rd shall reign forever—Your God, O Zion, from generation to generation.
Praise the L-rd” (Psalms 146:10).

1.       View of the Eitz Yosef
The Otzar ha-Tefillah cites the Eitz Yosef of Rabbi Chanokh Zundel ben Yosef of Bialystok as explaining the Kedushah to be a declaration of G-d’s absolute transcendence. The word “kadosh” means separate or removed. Therefore, according to the Eitz Yosef, the threefold repetition of “kadosh” denotes G-d’s transcendence in three categories: a human being's body (guf), the vital force within the body (nefesh), and the soul (neshamah). The Kedushah teaches us that G-d is separate and removed from all three sets of limitations.

The Eitz Yosef comments on the verse “Blessed be the glory of G-d from its Place" that in saying this, we acknowledge that we don’t know G-d’s “place”—for this is beyond the mortal mind. Thus the main idea behind the Kedushah according to this view is that of G-d’s absolute transcendence.

Yet despite this fact, the Creator is not utterly remote and disconnected from us. The conclusion, “The L-rd shall reign forever—Your God, O Zion, from generation to generation,” says the Eitz Yosef, is our request for G-d to reveal his kingship through Israel and through the Holy Temple (may it be rebuilt speedily in our days). This revelation redeems the world entirely  (Rabbi Chanokh Zundel cites the Maharal of Prague’s Nesivos Olam as underlying his interpretation.)  

2.       View of the Yavetz
Rabbi Yaakov Emden, known as the “Yavetz”  (the acronym of his name, Yaakov ben Zvi),  in his famous Siddur Beis Yaakov, offers a kabbalistic interpretation of the Kedushah. We join the angels in declaring G-d’s holiness that suffuses the array of the Ten Sefiros, through which the world and all it contains came into existence and is governed. The first “kadosh” corresponds to the higher triad: Keser (Crown), Chokhmah (Wisdom), Binah (Understanding). The second “kadosh” corresponds to the middle triad: Chesed (Kindness), Gevurah (Might), Tiferes (Beauty or Harmony). The third “kadosh” corresponds to the lower triad: Netzach (Eternity/ Victory), Hod (Splendor), Yesod (Foundation)—while the phrase “milo khol ha'aretz kevodo / the entire world is filled with His Glory” corresponds to Malkhus (Kingship).

Rather than stressing G-d’s transcendence, the Yavetz sees the Kedushah as instructing us concerning G-d’s immanence within all of His causations or powers, namely the Ten Sefiros. G-d’s holiness is present in all of His doings, right here and now.

With this, we’ll enter the Chassidic realm.

3.       View of the Baal ha-Tanya
Rabbi Shneur Zalman of Liadi, founder of Chabad and author of the Tanya, discusses the Kedushah in Likutey Torah, parshas Shelach (as excerpted in the Likutey Torah Siddur, pp. 121-122). The “Alter Rebbe” of Chabad explains that the Torah was given on the three planes of thought, speech and action, each with its own commandments. Yet they are all the same to Hashem. Nor is there any difference between “high” and “low,” for everything in the hierarchy of creation is as naught before the Blessed One, who is without end or beginning. Hashem transcends everything and is holy and removed from all creation—even though he enlivens all and brings everything into existence. We say “kadosh” three times in our desire to “draw down” G-d’s holiness into the three categories of thought, speech and action. Accordingly, the Kedushah is an act of theurgy (or nearly so), a means of channeling the Divine holiness into this world.

Rabbi Shneur Zalman goes on to say that through our engagement in Torah and mitzvos in these three categories, which are “garments” for the soul, we will be able to experience the radiance of the Shekhinah (Divine Presence) and become incorporated into the ultimate reality of the Divine Oneness. This is another powerful kavanah to bear in mind when reciting the Kedushah.

(Reb Noson of Breslov similarly relates the threefold declaration of “kadosh” to thought, speech and action in Likutey Halakhos, Hil. Dayyanim 4:5. He adds that when one sanctifies himself in these three areas, it follows that “milo khol ha'aretz kevodo / the entire world is filled with His Glory”—i.e., the G-dliness hidden within all things will be revealed. Maybe he’s describing the same experience as Rabbi Shneur Zalman in a slightly different way.)

Elsewhere in Likutey Torah, Rabbi Shneur Zalman expounds on “Atah kadosh,” the prayer text which immediately follows the Kedushah and ends with the blessing “Ha-E-l ha-Kadosh (Blessed is the Holy G-d)” He explains that G-d’s Name is exalted alone, beyond all the “worlds” (in the Kabbalah there are four, but I think he means not only the “four worlds” but also the mysterious realities beyond them, which are sometimes described as tzachtzachos, “pure lights”). Only a faint illumination of the Divine Name is drawn upon the earth and heavens. “Atah kadosh”— the Blessed One in His glory and His essence is absolutely transcendent (akin to the view of the Eitz Yosef).

4.       View of the Keser Nehorah
Another early Chassidic master, Rabbi Aharon Hakohen of Zhelikhov, in his commentary “Keser Nehorah” (published in the Siddur Tefilah Yesharah, known as the “Berditchover Siddur”), remarks on “Atah kadosh” in terms of yirah(fear, awe, reverence) and ahavah (love). (These are pervasive themes throughout his commentary.)

First, Rabbi Aharon states that “Atah kadosh” alludes to yiras Hashem, fear and awe of G-d. (Rabbi Chanokh Zundel of Bialystok in Anaf Yosef says the same.)  This is because these words refer to the Ein Sof, the Infinite One who gives life to all, just as the soul enlivens the body. This is the culmination of the Kedushah, for there is no limit to G-d’s holiness. Hence, “Atah kadosh” should bring one to yiras Hashem, a sense of religious awe.

The next phrase is “vi-shimkha kadosh (and Your Name is holy).” This alludes to the four-letter Divine Name “HaVaYaH” (yud-heh-vav-heh), also known as the Shem ha-Etzem, or Essential Name. Each letter corresponds to one of the “Four Worlds” and animates it:
Yud = Atzilus (World of Emanation)
Heh = Beriah (World of Creation)
Vav = Yetzirah (World of Formation)
Heh = Asiyah (World of Action)

Rabbi Aharon states that this alludes to ahavas Hashem, the love of G-d, which reciprocates G-d’s love of Israel, in that G-d constricted His Infinite Light in these four basic constrictions (tzimtzumim), thus to create this world for our ultimate spiritual benefit (as well as the benefit of all beings).

When used as a kavanah for the Kedushah, Rabbi Aharon’s teaching thus “calibrates” the feelings of ahavah vi-yirah, love and awe of G-d.

5.       A Breslov Perspective
Now we’re ready to consider a Breslov teaching, which will give us yet another perspective and another set of kavanos. A novel way of understanding the Kedushah may be constructed on the basis of Likutey Moharan II, 7. (Please note that this is our interpretation of a teaching in Likutey Moharan. The original only discusses the Kedushah of Musaf. But the Rebbe’s words seem to extend to the regular Kedushah, as well, as we will discuss below.)

In  section 7 of that lesson, Rebbe Nachman speaks of two hasagos, or perceptions, which are expressed by the angels in the Kedushah of Musaf. One group of angels declares, M’lo kol ha’aretz kivodo, the entire world is full of His Glory” (as in the regular Kedushah). The Rebbe calls this “M’lo” for short. It is the immanent Divine Presence, the essential unity into which all diversity is subsumed.[ii]   However, a second group of angels asks, “Ayeh makom kivodo? Where is the place of His Glory?” The Rebbe calls this “Ayeh” for short. It is the world of mystery, the realm of the unmanifest.

These two hasagos correspond to two followers of a tzaddik: one is his Talmid (disciple), the other is his Ben (son), who is an actual extension of the father. They in turn correspond to two groups of people, the dorei matah,” “those who dwell below,” and the  “dorei ma’alah,” “those who dwell above.”

To recap, the angels express two opposite perceptions:
1.       Milo kol ha’aretz kivodo – Immanence.  In Torah 7, this is the perception of the Talmid (disciple) and the “dorei matah,” “those who dwell below.”
2.       Ayeh – Mah. Transcendence. In Torah 7, this is the perception of the Ben (son) and the “dorei ma’alah,” “those who dwell above.”

Although opposites, these two perceptions are “flip sides of the same coin.” Both are true. And the Rebbe states that they must be combined for a person to experience yirah—which is the prerequisite for serving G-d. One can only experience yirah when there is a distance between self and other, in this case, the worshipper and the object of worship, which is G-d Himself.

The Rebbe adds that the disciple also must possess the perception of the son, and the son  must also possess the perception of the disciple. Only then can there be shelimus, or wholeness. And lack of this wholeness can lead to grave error.

In section 9 of the same lesson, the Rebbe he points out that if one is privy only to the perception of “Ayeh” and “Mah” (as are the “son” and “those who dwell above”), he risks succumbing to atheism – since G-d is ultimately a mystery and beyond mortal understanding. And on the other hand, if one is privy only to the perception of “M’lo” (as are the “disciple” and “those who dwell below”), he risks bittul bi-metziyus, self-nullification to the point of being “blinded by the light.”

Therefore, one must combine the two contrary perceptions to create yirah. And in that “margin,” one can serve G-d, and thus fulfill the purpose of creation.

Both opposites are suggested in each of the main declarations of the regular Kedushah, as well. We say “Kadosh, Kadosh, Kadosh…” indicating G-d’s transcendence, but in the same breath, “m’lo kol ha’aretz kivodo,” indicating G-d’s immanence.[iii]This may be understood as a perception mi-le-ma’alah le-matah, from above to below.

The next declaration is “Baruchkevod Hashem mimkomo” The kavod Hashem or Divine Glory denotes G-d’s immanence, while “mimkomo,” “His Place,” denotes G-d’s transcendence.[iv]Thus, this may be understood as a perception mi-le-matah le-ma’alah, from below to above. In each verse, the two perceptions are combined. According to Breslov (if our understanding is correct), this is the lesson of the Kedushah.






[i]The Targum on Isaiah 6:3 interprets the threefold “kadosh” to mean that the Blessed One is holy above, in the highest heavens; holy on earth; and holy for all eternity. Rashi subscribes to this interpretation, as well (ad loc.).
[ii]In Likutey Moharan I, 33 (sec. 2), Rebbe Nachman cites this verse from Isaiah to support the idea of G-d’s immanence: “M’lo kol ha’aretz k’vodo,” the entire world is full of His Glory. He also quotes the Tikuney Zohar (Tikkun 57, 91b): “les asar panui minei, no place is devoid of Him”—for G-d fills all worlds (memale kol almin) and  encompasses all worlds(sovev kol almin) (Zohar III, 225a).
[iii]Reb Noson expounds on Isaiah 6:3 that this declaration of G-d’s simultaneous transcendence and immanence represents the perfection of G-d’s sovereignty (malkhus), in fulfillment of the verse, “Do I not fill the heavens [the transcendent] and the earth [the immanent]? says G-d” (Jeremiah 23:24) (Likutey Halakhos, Rosh Chodesh 4:3).
[iv]In Likutey Moharan I, 24 (sec. 7), Rebbe Nachman cites “Boruch kevod Hashem mimkomo,” Ezekiel 3:12, to describe the baal hasagah’s or mystic’s spiritual ascent to Keser (Crown), the highest of the Ten Sefiros and the domain of pure potential in creation. Thus, “Keser,” the transcendent level, may be called “G-d’s Place.”

Rabbi Shalom Arush and Rabbi Lazer Brody Coming to Borough Park

$
0
0

Rabbi Shalom Arush, noted Breslov mashpia and author, will be speaking in Borough Park, accompanied by his associate and translator, Rabi Lazer Brody. This will surely be a memorable evening.

Location:
Young Israel-Beth El of Borough Park
4802 Fifteenth Ave
Brooklyn, NY

Date:
Tuesday March 15th
8:00 PM

Admission: $10
Men and women invited

For more details, please e-mail:

Kavanos for “Shema”: Part 1

$
0
0


By Dovid Sears
Based on selections from Likutey Halakhos and other Breslov works, as found in Rabbi Noson Zvi Kenig’s Siddur Shaarey Ratzon, “Kavanos Kriyas Shema,” pp. 203-205 (Bnei Brak, first edition).
L’ilui nishmas imi morasi Gittel bas Ida, a”h, whose yahrtzeit was 5 Adar II.

We recently discussed several kavanos—“intentions,” or in this case, conceptual frameworks—for the “Kedushah” in the communal prayer service. Another key part of the davening, whether we are in or out of shul, that deserves our attention is the “Shema.” (I remember reading that Rabbi Dov Ber, the “Mittler Rebbe” of Lubavitch, once said, “The deeper one’s ‘Shema,’ the deeper one’s Shemoneh Esreh”—or something similar. I no longer have the source.)

Here we will sum up a few Breslov teachings that can serve as kavanos when one recites the “Shema.” Like virtually all Breslov teachings, they are excerpts from larger contexts—either lessons from Likutey Moharan, sections of Reb Noson’s Likutey Halakhos, which are based on lessons in Likutey Moharan, or other Breslov works. Thus, to understand these teachings about the “Shema,” we also need to understand their underpinnings. We’ll do the best we can to sum them up.

 "Hear, O Israel: the Lord [Y-H-V-H] our God, the Lord [Y-H-V-H] is one" (Deuteronomy 6:4).
שְׁמַע יִשְׂרָאֵל ה'אֱלֹהֵינוּ ה'אֶחָד

1    Bringing Down the Light

Reb Noson cites the Arizal, who states that the kabbalistic intention
when reciting the “Shema” is to unify Abba and Ima (the sefiros of Chokhmah and Binah), thus to “draw down” the higher mentalities (“mochin”) to the lower sefiros. To the uninitiated, the meaning of this is obscure. But in Chassidic fashion, Reb Noson brings the Kabbalah down to earth—or at least, he heads in that direction. Reb Noson expounds on the Arizal’s principle as it applies to the person performing the mitzvah, and how it affects that person’s spiritual condition and state of mind: By reciting the Shema, we express our faith in G-d’s unity and in so doing, gain a more vivid spiritual sense of that unity.
  
However, Reb Noson adds, we still have not been privileged to reveal G-d’s malkhus (kingship) to all humanity. This universal revelation is the ultimate purpose of the tzimtzum (constriction of the Infinite Divine Light) at the beginning of creation, which will be fulfilled in the time of Mashiach. We contribute to this redemptive knowledge every time we recite the Shema and accept G-d’s malkhus upon ourselves, particularly by contemplating and revealing G-d’s unity when we pronounce the word “echad.” 

This tikkun still requires that we “draw down” the light of that Divine Unity to the level of the middos(i.e., the “emotional traits” that parallel the seven lower sefiros). This is accomplished by our overcoming foolish and evil thoughts with holy and good thoughts. Then when we serve G-d in a measured way, “one step at a time,” we imbue ourselves with G-d’s malkhus and reveal it to all the world.

This is also the theme of the two paragraphs of “vi-ahavtah” and “vi-hayah im shamo’a” that we recite after the Shema. That is, after bringing about the “yichuda ila’ah” (“upper unification,” as the Zohar describes the Shema), we accept the “yoke of the kingdom of heaven” by expressing our love of G-d, and by guarding against evil thoughts (as in “hishamru lakhem pen yifteh levavkhem vi-sartem…”)—for all evil thoughts are aspects of the Evil Inclination and idolatry. Then we recite the third paragraph about the tzitzis (fringes on four-cornered garments)and the tekheiles (blue string), which the Zohar describes as destroying all evil. This empowers our struggle to overcome evil thoughts with good thoughts, and thus reveal G-d’s malkhus.

The same tikkun is reflected in the declaration that follows the Shema: “Barukh shem kevod malkhuso li-olam va’ed,” “Blessed be the name of His glorious kingship forever” (an addition of Chazal based on the verse "Blessed be His glorious name," Psalm 72:19).

The Shema represents what Rebbe Nachman calls “beisa ila’ah,” the “upper house,” while “barukh shem kevod” represents “beisa tata’ah,” the “lower house.” (These in turn correspond to the upper and lower letters “heh” in the Four-Letter Name yud-heh-vav-heh,and the Supernal Jerusalem and Earthly Jerusalem—corresponding to the sefirosof Binah and Malkhus.) Through this tikkun of the “lower house,” we merit to reveal G-d’s malkhus to all humanity, even to those who are extremely far from holiness. This reflects the Gemara’s teaching that “Barukh Shem” is recited in a whisper because it is analagous to the tasty burnt remnants at the bottom of a pot (“tzikey kedeirah”) that the Princess craves, although it is beneath her station—therefore, her servant must provide it to her “on the sly” (Pesachim 56a). [That is, according to this line of interpretation, the Shekhinah desires the service of those who are unworthy, as well as those who are righteous] (Abridgement of Likutey Halakhos, Hil. Minchah7, sec. 73-74, based on Likutey Moharan I, 49; see there.)

2    Everything is Included in the “Shema”

Rabbi Nachman Goldstein, one of the youngest disciples of Reb Noson, who later became the Rav of Tcherin and the leading Breslov scholar of his generation, discusses the Shema in his Chassidic chiddushimon Shulchan Arukh, “Nachas ha-Shulchan” (the entire sefer being based on the first lesson in Likutey Moharan).

There, he states that all the kavanos of reciting the Shema are incorporated in the simple belief in G-d’s Unity and Oneness—that G-d is the One Authority, Ruler, and Overseer of all that exists; He transcends all things, and there is nothing higher than Him.

This includes all of the kavanos, which (as stated above) are to “draw down” all of the mochin (higher “mentalities,” namely Chokhmah and Binah) when we recite the Shema, thus to unite the Holy One (“Kud’sha Brikh Hu,” the Zohar’s term for G-d’s transcendent aspect) and the Shekhinah (G-d’s immanent aspect).

That is, it is necessary to elicit all aspects of mystical knowledge (Da’as) and higher consciousness into the simple faith in G-d’s Oneness, may He be blessed (Nachas ha-Shulchan, Orach Chaim sec. 48).
  
We hope to return to this subject in the next posting, im yirtza Hashem.

Purim Teaching From the Izhbitzer

$
0
0

From The Path of the Baal Shem Tov, pp. 112-13

This teaching comes from Rabbi Mordechai Yosef Leiner, the Rebbe of Izhbitz (Izbica), from his classic “Mei HaShiloach,” in the section “Likutey HaShas: Megillah,” 12. We have adapted it slightly to make it less cryptic.


Megillas Esther describes the feast of King Achashverosh and the refusal of Queen Vashti to appear before him unclothed. Therefore, the King sought the advice of his royal ministers, who are mentioned by name: “And those close (vi-hakarov) to him: Carshena, Sheisar, Admasa...” (Esther 1:14).


Rabbi Levi said: This entire verse alludes to the sacrificial offerings (korbanos). [Taking the term “royal minister” as an allusion to the ministering angels, R. Levi rendered the names in the verse interpretively, using various word-plays.] “‘Carshena’’—the Ministering Angels declared before the Holy One, blessed be He, ‘Master of the Universe! Did any other nation offer before You yearling lambs (karim bnei shanah) as the Jews have offered before You? “Sheisar—Did any other nation offer before You two turtledoves (shtey torim) as have the Jews? ‘Admasa’—Did any other nation build before You an altar of earth (adamah) as have the Jews?” (Megillah 12b).

The relationship between this Talmudic passage and the incident of Vashti may be derived from a teaching of the Baal Shem Tov. Vashti was asked to appear before the King naked, but did not come. Concerning this, the Baal Shem Tov remarked, “The aspect of nakedness still has not come.”

Rabbi Mordechai Yosef Leiner of lzhbitz explained this as follows:
God gave the Jewish people the Torah and mitzvos, which are garments by means of which His Essence may be grasped. In this world it is impossible for a human being to apprehend God’s Essence except by means of garments. Thus, Godliness is concealed within physicality—to the extent that whatever we perceive is through the intermediacy of garments.

In the present state of reality, God pours forth shefa (bounty) by way of the Four Worlds [parallel to the four letters of the Divine Name YHVH], using whichever sefirah is necessary at a given time until the shefa reaches this world. All this is so the influx of shefa is graspable. Also, the nations of the world are able to receive some of this, for they, too, can grasp the outer garment. However, they misuse this shefa when they perform all sorts of abominations.

When the Men of the Great Assembly saw that Achashverosh had commanded Vashti to appear before him naked, they understood that God wanted to confer upon the Jewish People a true revelation without any garment, as will be the case in the Ultimate Future. Then the Holy One, blessed be He, will reveal His light without any garment. However, as long as man is attached to his lower nature, such a revelation can only reinforce his physical passions.

Therefore, at this time the Men of the Great Assembly endeavored to uproot the desire for sexual immorality from the heart of humanity (Yoma 69b). This would have made this direct revelation equally available to those who had struggled against immoral desires and those who had pursued them without restraint. That is why the Ministering Angels protested, “How can the nations of the world be permitted to grasp the aspect of nakedness? Did any other nation offer before You...” For even when the light was concealed from them, the Jewish People exerted themselves with all their strength to bring sacrificial offerings and to serve God in order to come closer to the light. Throughout history, they worked through the barriers of physicality, symbolized by the sacrificial offerings, by striving to live according to the Torah. Thus, it is fitting that in the Ultimate Future God will reveal His light to them completely, without any intermediary.

It is written, “My soul longs and even expires for the courtyards of God; my heart and my flesh will sing unto the Living God” (Psalms 84:3). That is, in the present state of reality, since garments are necessary, “my soul longs and even expires for the courtyards of God,” for the physical Holy Temple and the various forms of Divine Service, which are garments of His light. However, “my heart and my flesh will sing unto the Living God.” My waiting and hoping is for the revelation of light which will take place in the future, without any garments—a ¬revelation of life in its very simplicity. This is suggested by the term “Living God.” But those nations that did not exert themselves in Divine service nor endeavor to draw closer to the Divine light, why should they deserve to share this revelation when, at last, struggle and garments will not exist?[1]

--
[1] However, rightous non-Jews will also receive a portion in the World to Come; see Sanhedrin 105b; Yerushalmi Berakhos 9; Bereishis Rabbah 26:2; Zohar, Pekudey; Pirkey Rabbi Eliezer 34; Mishneh Torah, Hilkhos Melakhim 8:10-1. The Kabbalists frequently cite the teaching from Tanna D’vei Eliyahu 9:1: “I call heaven and earth to witness than anyone—Jew or non-Jew, man or woman, slave or bondmaid—can attain Ruach ha-Kodesh (Divine Inspiration). Everything is in accordance with one’s deeds.”

Purim Mysteries

$
0
0


Rabbi Dovid Sears
Based on a discussion from asimplejew.blogspot.com

Q. While I was reviewing books on the subject of Purim, I ran across this teaching from Likutey Moharan II, 74: “Purim is a preparation for Pesach. Through the mitzvah of Purim we are protected from chometz on Pesach.”

In my own slow-paced learning of Likutey Moharan, I have not yet reached this lesson. I can’t say that I fully comprehend what Rebbe Nachman of Breslov is trying to teach us. I know that joy is the main aspect of Purim and that chometz symbolizes the character trait of arrogance. I don’t yet understand how the joy we experience on Purim helps protect us from arrogance.

A. Like most of Rebbe Nachman’s teachings, this lesson is full of mysteries. This reflects Reb Noson’s words in his Introduction to Likutey Moharan, citing the Gemara (Chagigah 13a) that in mystical matters, one must simultaneously reveal and conceal. This is particularly true of Rebbe Nachman’s teaching style. So whatever we say must be understood as speculation only.

1) On a basic level, the Rebbe is expounding on the “coincidence” that in the Jewish calendar, Purim is followed by parshas Parah and then by Pesach, and he finds profound meaning in these connections. Even though the miracle of Purim took place more than one thousand years after the Exodus, the paradigm it represents “paves the way” for Pesach.

Rebbe Nachman states: “Through Purim, we are protected from chometz on Pesach.” Purim represents hidden miracles; Pesach represents open miracles. Purim shows us that what appears to be natural is truly supernatural. It elevates us above nature, above ego, and destroys Amalek, which represents sexual immorality (symbolized by the fact that the Amalekites sexually mutilated their victims) and disbelief (the word “Amalek” = gematria “sofek,” or doubt). Thus, Purim protects us from chometz, which variously represents ego, lust, and the illusion of nature as autonomous—the antithesis of Pesach.

2) Rabbi Borukh Ephraim of Homel, a student of the Tcheriner Rov and author of Be’ibey haNachal on Likutey Moharan, looks at this teaching from another angle. First let’s recap the original lesson in Likutey Moharan:

After Purim, we read parshas Parah, which is a preparation for Pesach. This is customary because when the Beis haMikdash still stood, we were required to eat the Korban Pesach in a state of taharah, purity from tumas mes (ritual defilement that comes from contact with the dead). This is attained through the ashes of the Parah Adumah, the Red Heifer. Today, lacking the Beis haMikdash and the ashes of the Parah Adumah, we cannot do so. However, in a spiritual sense we reenact this process every year beginning on Purim, when we commemorate the “pur” (pey-vav-reish), the lot that was cast concerning the fate of the Jews, after which Purim is named. Then a little later we read parshas Parah. Thus, the “pur” of Purim turns into the aspect of “Parah” (pey-reish, the root letters of “pur,” plus the letter “heh”), the Red Heifer. (Rebbe Nachman takes this connection of “pur” and “parah” from a teaching of the ARI zal in Pri Eitz Chaim, Sha’ar Purim 6, which is too complex for us to discuss here.)

The Rebbe finds an allusion to this idea in Shir haShirim: “Sifsosav shoshanim notfos mor ‘oveir… His lips are roses overflowing with myrrh.” “His lips” refer to Pesach, which the ARI interprets as “peh-sach,” a mouth that speaks (Sha’ar haKavannos, Inyan Pesach, Drush 3; Pri Etz Chaim, Sha’ar Chag haMatzos, Chap. 7. In other words, on Pesach we can now speak HaShem’s praises openly, as free men.) “Shoshanah” has the same gematria as “Esther,” thus it hints to the Purim story. And “mor” hints to Mordechai, whom the Gemara homiletically connects with the biblical phrase “mor d’ror,” flowing myrrh (Chullin 139b). The word “d’ror,” which literally means “free,” also alludes to Pesach, the Festival of Freedom.

This Purim-Pesach connection is further borne out by the verse: “Shivas yamim tokhal matzos ka’asher tzivisikha le-mo’ed chodesh ha-aviv ki vo yatzasa mimitzrayim ve-lo yeira’u fana’i reikam . . . Seven days you shall eat matzos as I have commanded you at the season of the month of Aviv [“springtime,” the biblical name for Nisan], for then you came out of Egypt; and you shall not appear before Me empty-handed” (Exodus 23:15). The initials of the five words “mi-mitzrayim velo yeira’u fana’i reikam” spell the word “Purim.” For Purim is the way to Pesach. Through it, one can be protected from chometz on Pesach…

Reb Noson, the editor of Likutey Moharan, mentions that at this point, the Rebbe paused and did not finish explaining this idea. Then the Rebbe added another cryptic remark: “At first, all beginnings were from Pesach; thus, all mitzvos are zekher le-yetziyas Mitzrayim, in commemoration of the Exodus from Egypt. Ve-’achshav, and now…”

He stopped again, and did not finish.

The author of Be’ibey haNachal detects in the Rebbe’s words some amazing hints as to how the derekh of Breslov works today, after the Rebbe’s histalkus (ascent from the body). To sum up the gist of his remarks:

Nachman” is numerically equivalent to “Pesach” (148) – “ve-’achshav,” and now, we can all make a new beginning by going to the Rebbe’s holy burial place on Rosh Hashanah, which is so called because it is the “head” (rosh) and beginning of the year. Pesach is also a new beginning. Thus the lesson states that Purim is named after the “pur,” and subsequently turns into “parah,” which is spelled pey-reish-heh. These letters are the initials of Pesach (pey) and Rosh Hashanah (reish-heh), which together include all spiritual rectifications (tikkunim) (see Likutey Moharan I, 49). This is the aspect of the Parah Adumah, which “purified the impure, and contaminated the pure” (Rashi, Numbers 19:22, end). That is, when one comes to the cemetery, where the dead are buried, one contracts tumah. However, by reciting Tehillim and praying to Hashem from the depths of one’s heart – especially by reciting the ten psalms of the Rebbe’s awesome Tikkun haKlalli– one “purifies the impure.” This is accomplished by teshuvah, and by rectifying the spiritual damage one has caused, through the merit and power of the tzaddik who is buried there. Thus, one may make a new start in serving G-d, which is the aspect of Pesach and the Exodus, leaving one’s state of impurity and receiving the Torah anew. All this is accomplished through the holy grave of the Rebbe, whose name has the same gematria as “Pesach.”

This leads to our personal ge’ulah, our inner exodus from spiritual alienation, which is true slavery, to freedom from the ego and self-serving desires. This freedom is gained through the Torah.

3) Breslov tradition includes still another interpretation of this lesson from a different vantage point. According to Rabbi Levi Yitzchak Bender (Si’ach Sarfey Kodesh VI, 233), the Breslover Chassidim of old used to say that the Rebbe gave us a precious piece of spiritual advice by concluding “ve-’achshav / and now…” That is, one can only serve Hashem in the present moment -- for the past is gone, and the future has not yet come, as the Rebbe states (Sichos haRan 288). Therefore, the present moment is all that truly exists.

Breslov Teachings On Purim

$
0
0


From the anthology Oztar HaYirah (Likutei Eitzos HaMeshulosh), Purim.

These selections are, in turn, from Reb Noson’s Likkutei Halakhos.
Translated by Dovid Sears
The Sitra D’Mosa [“Side of Death,” meaning the state of estrangement from God, Who is the source of life] is primarily derived from self-importance. This is the root of the klippah (“husk”)—the spiritual force that seeks to obstruct the light of holiness, associated with Haman and Amalek, the archenemies of the Jewish people. (4)


*


The main strategy of the klippah of Amalek is to attack the weak by convincing them that there is no hope, God forbid. [1] However, by finding the good point within yourself, even when you seem to be in a state of spiritual decline, you conquer Amalek. (1)


*


Through the simcha (joy) of Purim, it is possible to gain lofty perceptions— to attain "the ultimate knowledge, which is not-knowing." The seemingly opposite paradigms of "knowing" and "not knowing" coalesce and become one. Every trace of evil disappears, for at this exalted level, all is one, and all is good. (9)


*


When the holiness of Shabbos enters the world, the klippah of Amalek is subjugated. The Wine of Drunkenness, from which we refrain, is supplanted by the Wine of Joy. When we recite the Kiddush over wine, a spirit of holiness encompasses all the souls and holy sparks that were extricated from the realm of the klippos during the six days of the week, and now, with the advent of Shabbos, they ascend to their place of rest.


Their main path of ascent is through simchah (joy) and the Kiddush that we recite over the wine, which is an aspect of the Wine of Joy. Through this, our "hot blood" is tempered, and we can serve God with a heart inflamed with devotion.


This is why on Purim, which celebrates the extirpation of the seed of Amalek, it is a great mitzvah to drink wine to the point of intoxication. On Purim the wine is an aspect of the Wine of Joy, which destroys the klippah of Amalek; for the main downfall of Amalek is accomplished through simchah. (20)


*


The klippah of Amalek, which manifests itself as false wisdoms and heretical philosophies, derives from the ChalalHaPanui—the Vacated Space that precedes all creation.[2] Because of this precedence, it is axiomatic that on all levels of reality, “the klippah precedes the fruit.”


Thus Amalek is called reishis (the "first")— "Amalek was the first of nations" (Numbers 24:20); its power derives from the Vacated Space that precedes creation altogether. Analogously, Esau was born before his twin brother, Jacob, and was considered to be the firstborn son.


However, in truth, the holy transcends everything; God is the primordial reality, and God created the Vacated Space. Therefore, Israel, by power of their simple faith that God transcends and precedes everything, can ascend beyond all the wisdoms and heretical philosophies that come from the Vacated Space. This is why Israel is called the "firstborn," as the verse states, "My child, my firstborn, Israel" (Exodus 4:22), and why Jacob took the right of the firstborn from his brother, Esau, from whom Amalek descends.


This faith destroys the klippah of Haman and Amalek, and reveals the Song of the Future World. [3] (3)


*


On Purim a great and wondrous light shines forth that reaches the very depths of this lowly World of Action: the spiritual light of Mordechai and Esther. Just as gazing upon the face of the true tzaddik is spiritually transforming, [4] so is the experience of this lofty light. Through it, we attain humility and nullify our self-importance, which is the klippah of Haman and Amalek.


The reading of the Megillah in particular reflects this, for the light of the holy faces of Mordechai and Esther is hidden within the Megillah, the scroll that they composed. When we read their words in the Megillah, the light of their faces shines upon us, and it is as if we gazed upon them in person. Our higher consciousness becomes charged, as it were; our self-importance falls away, and we attain true humility. This is the eternal life of the World to Come.


Lowliness and the "pride" that derives from the side of holiness become as one, in keeping with the verse, "In the place you find His greatness, there you find His humility." [5] This fusion is the ultimate perfection of humility. Thus, on Purim our sages command us [6] to drink wine "until you do not know the difference between: ArurHaman (Cursed is Haman)," which corresponds to nullifying the ego," and “BaruchMordechai (Blessed is Mordechai)," which corresponds to holy pride. This leads to true joy, the simchah of Purim. (5)


NOTES


[1] The nation of Amalek attacked the weary and enfeebled Israelites on their journey through the wilderness, sexually abusing and dismembering their captives; see Rashi citing MidrashTanchumah on Deuteronomy 25:17-19. Amalek is a symbol of human cruelty throughout rabbinic literature, much like the Nazis in the contemporary experience. On a deeper level, the Kabbalists point out that word Amalek bears the same gematria (numerical value) as sofek, meaning "doubt." Thus, the klippah of Amalek is the voice within us all that denies God and the true tzaddikim and simple emunah (faith).


[2] The SeferEitzChaim of the Ari z"l begins with an abstruse account of the mysteries of creation: In the beginning, the Infinite Divine Light was omnipresent. When it arose within His will to create the universe, God constricted the light to the “sides” in all directions, leaving a Vacanted Space (ChalalHaPanui). Into this Vacated Space, God "beamed" a thread of the light that had been constricted; and from this thread of light all things, spiritual and physical, derive their existence. For a practical application of this teaching in divine service, see LikkuteiMoharan I, 49.


[3] Likkutei Moharan I, 64.


[4] Likkutei Moharan I, 4.


[5] Megillah 31a.


[6] Megillah 7a. See Shulchan Aruch, Orach Chaim 695:2 for the halachic parameters of this law, which are quite lenient in the case of a person who is weak, or otherwise incapable of drinking to the point of intoxication. This obligation does not apply to women.

Remembering Rabbi Shmuel Horowitz

$
0
0


By Rabbi Dovid Zeitlin


Monday night and Tuesday, March 21-22 / 12 Adar, is the yahrtzeit of of HaGaon HaChossid R' Shmuel ben R' Yeshayah Halevi Horowitz, zt"l, one of the extraordinary Breslever mashpiyim (teachers) of the past generation. He passed away in 5732 / 1972. All remember him as a giant in Nigleh, Nistar and Chassidus, who was constantly in a visible state of deveykus to Hashem. Reb Elazar Kenig, shlit"a, of Tsfas remembers: "Er iz gevein mufshat fun der velt . . . He was beyond this world." His lips were constantly occupied with words of Torah and Tefillah.

We are all indebted to him for his mesirus nefesh (self-sacrifice) for all matters related to the Rebbe -- particularly for printing and disseminating ALL of the Rebbe's seforim during those very difficult years of poverty and hunger in Eretz Yisroel. He redeemed, compiled, saved and printed under extremely adverse conditions the writings of HaGaon HaKadosh R' Avrohom ben R' Nachman Chazan (i.e., he was the son of Reb Nachman Tulchiner, zt"l, leading disciple of Reb Noson zt"l). These works include Bi'ur HaLikkutim (on Likkutei Moharan), Chochmah U-Tevunah (on Sippurey Ma'asiyos), Kochvei Ohr (oral histories and traditions), etc. If not for Reb Shmuel, these "crown jewels" would have been lost forever.

He was a "flamm fieyr," a true "soul on fire," with an extremely profound sense of hiskashrus (spiritual bonding) to the Tzaddik. His unbelievable journey from Eretz Yisroel to Poland and Russia in the 1920s, in order to get to know and serve all Gedolei Breslev, is recorded in his multi-volume autobiography, "Yemey Shmuel." This courageous and dangerous trip, during those dark years of Communist oppression, and what followed upon his arrival in the Ukraine gave us a unique window into the various Breslover Chassidim in Uman during the last years of the community's existence. He spent three Rosh Hashanos in Uman during those years with mesirus nefesh. He was a unique figure, even amongst the great Chassidim of his day.

Reb Shmuel was a "baal tzurah" an impressive person to behold; he was also a yachsan (a person of noble lineage -- Reb Shmuel was a direct descendant on his father's side from the Shelah Hakadosh and many great tzaddikim). And he had "yichus atzmo" -- he was a model of devotion and dedication to all inyonim of the Tzaddik. He was a true inspiration for Breslover Chassidim and for everyone.

Reb Shmuel personally reached out to Jews from all walks of life and brought countless people closer to Yiddishkeit and Chassidus. A few years ago, a collection of his letters (both in Yiddish and Hebrew) were printed in the multi-volume "Michtevey Shmuel."


More recently, Breslever Chassidim in Monroe reprinted his powerful "Ma'amar Hiskashrus L'Tzaddik HaEmes," with additional footnotes. It sells for $6 a copy. Anyone interested in obtaining this ma'amar may contact the publisher: Gedolim Tzaddikim, 845-248-3449, or email gdoilymtzadykem@gmail.com.

It is interesting that this fiery mystic and profound thinker was also known to personally prepare many special, tasty dishes in honor of Shabbos (I think he started on Wednesday). This was a great and serious avodah for him every week. But it is not really a contradiction at all. Deveykus in the Tzaddik is the same as deveykus in Shabbos Kodesh -- one is in Neshomah (soul) and one is in Z'man (time). Besides, the Zohar HaKadosh says of the Tzaddik: "Antt hu Shabbos d'kulo yomin . . . You are Shabbos of all the days."

Zekhuso yagein aleinu, may his merits shield us!

Insanity

$
0
0


From
Esther: A Breslov Commentary on the Megillah (BRI), Chapter 1, pp. 10-12

He was the ACH ash ve ROSH—(Ach means brother or kinsman; rosh means head or the one in charge)—the brother of the grandiose one (Megillah 11a). He was the Achashverosh who reigned from Hodu (India) to Kush (Ethiopia)—over the entire world (ibid.).


Madness!
But we still don’t see it.
The ultimate insanity!
But we have yet to look.

In fact, we consider it “normal”—the way things are. The idea—the delusion—that one of us is “better” than the other, or the very idea that we can be compared. Can we say that an adult is better than a child, or that one person’s God given talents should be compared to another’s? It’s like comparing two colors or two fruits—is blue better than beige, are plums better than pears?

But in our distance from God, in our feeling apart from Him, we feel an inner vacuum, a loss of true self. So the inner question “Who am I”‘ is answered: “I’m better than he is,” or “I’m not like that.” And we never stop to wonder how out of touch we are if we think and espouse insanity like that.

Now, Haman was a nothing, a real nobody. He had been a village barber and a bathhouse attendant (Megillah 16a). But, over-inflated by ACH ash ve ROSH to grandiose proportions, he tried to allay his feelings of no self.

The “Haman” of the soul comes from the Vacuum—the realm of existence “vacated” by God. So whenever we enter the Vacuum, we feel like nothing and feel compelled to compensate by aggrandizing our selves. And sometimes we fill the inner Vacuum with vicarious pride by “bowing to Haman,” by idolizing the misperceived “betterness” of someone else’s self (Likutey Halakhot, Tefillin 6:23).

So ACH ash ve ROSH’s airs are all permeating. He reigns not only from India to Ethiopia, but from Hodu, the majestic, to Kush, the lowly. [1] Because when we “live” in Hodu we are externally “better”—by virtue of our talents or possessions. And when we “live” in Kush we are externally “lesser”—by virtue of our lack of talent or possessions. Yet, wherever we “live,” we are unequalled—by virtue of simply being our very own selves. And to see one another as “better” or “lesser” is insanity and a negation of our own selves (Likutey Halakhot, Orlah 5:16).

But to let go of this madness and leave the Vacuum, we need a “Mordekhai the Tzaddik” to show us the way. Because Mordekhai the Tzaddik personified greatness, not an external greatness, but a greatness which stemmed from a humble self Since he knew the secret of true humility, he was not compelled to aggrandize himself (Rabbi Nachman’s Wisdom #140). And he shows us how to let God in, leave the Vacuum and find our true selves.

Then we have no need to compare ourselves with others. We are even humbled before our own selves (Likutey Moharan I, 14:5; ibid. 79). Because we then know that our self is not our’s to compare with another’s—it is our essence, our Eternal Spark, our Godly self (ibid. 22:5; see Crossing The Narrow Bridge, Chapter 17).

So on Purim we exchange courses of food with one another to show that we are all equal. To those who have nothing we also give, so that they too should know they are equal.



---


[1] The Purim story took place in the Persian Achaemenid Empire. At that time, "Hodu," or India, was an enormous conglomerate and a relatively advanced ancient civilization, while Kush, although wealthy in resources and fiercely nationalistic, was a small vassal state to the south of Egypt.

13 Adar - Tcheriner Rov's Yahrtzeit

$
0
0
The 13th of Adar is the yahtzeit of Rabbi Nachman Goldstein (the Tcheriner Rov), one of the the greatest and most prolific scholar among Reb Noson's students. Please be sure to light a 24-hour candle and give a little tzedakah in his memory before Shabbos.

Biography taken from "
Breslov Pirkei Avot":

Rabbi Nachman Goldstein
(d. 1894)

Rav of Ukrainian town of Tcherin and grandson of Rabbi Aharon, the Rav of Breslov. Rabbi Nachman was one of the younger students of Reb Noson but later emerged as the greatest scholar in the Breslov community of the second generation. He edited and published Reb Noson's works and published many of his own, being the first to write commentaries specifically on Rebbe Nachman's teachings. His extant works include: Parparaot LeChokhmah (on Likutey Moharan), Rimzey HaMa'asiyot (on Sippurey Ma'asiyot), Nachat HaShulchan (on the first lesson in Likutey Moharan), Zimrat Ha'Aretz (on the theme of Eretz Yisrael in Likutey Moharan), Yekara de-Shabbata (on the theme of Shabbat in Likutey Moharan), Yerach HaEitanim (on the theme of Rosh HaShanah, Yom Kippur, and Sukkot in Likutey Moharan), and Chassidic anthologies Derekh Chassidim and Leshon Chassidim. He also produced a source index for Sefer HaMidot, tracing Rebbe Nachman's references throughout the Tanakh, Talmud, and Midrash.
Viewing all 556 articles
Browse latest View live